Why bitcoin is destined to become a niche asset

ING.com/THINK has our new report, Why bitcoin is destined to become a niche asset. One-paragraph summary:
In the long term, Bitcoin has little to offer to a wider audience, and will likely return to being a niche product for a select group of enthusiasts. What they regard as key benefits, may actually be impediments to wider adoption. Moreover, bitcoin’s high value today is based on shaky foundations, given that the platform is open source and can therefore be forked and copy-pasted easily. Scope for such cryptocurrency debasement is limited only by network effects and switching costs, but those may be smaller than expected.

Slightly longer summary:

  • The “true” value of bitcoin depends on its future use case. If users would en masse lose interest, then it could end at zero. On the other hand, in the unlikely scenario that Bitcoin takes over all worldwide payments, its value could rise beyond $1m.
  • Yet as Bitcoin is failing as payment system, and is now primarily used as asset to hold, the only remaining justification for investing in bitcoin is the assumption that others are willing to buy bitcoin at higher prices in the future.
  • Why won’t Bitcoin appeal to mass audience?
    • Regulation: Its decentralised nature makes it difficult to regulate. Governments and regulators may not ever come to like decentralised financial networks at all. A negative event, such as a price crash followed by public outcry, could trigger a regulatory crackdown.
    • Intermediaries: working without intermediaries is cherished by a core group of Bitcoin enthusiasts. The mass audience however dislikes having no rights, no recourse, no guarantees, no legal coverage, nothing. They just want secure, reliable and hassle-free access to their money, and a help desk to call when they lose their password.
    • Scalability: The Bitcoin network is currently clogged and the current level of transaction fees (average $8 in November) makes it very unattractive for small payments.
    • Volatility: while the value of “ordinary” money is managed by the central bank, Bitcoin’s supply is fixed and its value depends greatly on demand. This makes it inherently volatile.
    • Energy use: in the case of bitcoin, the price of taking out intermediaries is very high electricity consumption.
    • Governance: blockchain is great at rule enforcement, but does not provide at all for rule setting. This lack of governance makes implementing innovations slow and painful. Moreover, power may get concentrated in the hands of a few (miners, in the case of Bitcoin).
  • The current Bitcoin dominance appears built on the idea that bitcoin will remain the cryptocurrency of choice forever. Indeed, cryptocurrency, like other internet services, are subject to “network effects” and “switching costs”, creating a “winner takes all”-dynamic. However, with cryptocurrencies, these network effects and switching costs may be lower than thought. This is especially the case given Bitcoin’s open-source, forkable, clonable nature. It is easy to create a clone or close substitute. This means that Bitcoin may be scarce on its own blockchain, but its blockchain is in infinite supply. If bitcoin is “digital gold”, then forking and copy-pasting are successful forms of “digital alchemy”.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.